Video o ÚSMH
 
Vyhledej na webu
O časopisu Redakční rada Pro autory Obsahy čísel Přijaté články

Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia

 
Title: AN EVALUATION OF VELOCITY ESTIMATES WITH A CORRELATED NOISE: CASE STUDY OF IGS ITRF2014 EUROPEAN STATIONS
 
Authors: Klos Anna and Bogusz Janusz
 
DOI: 10.13168/AGG.2017.0009
 
Journal: Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia, Vol. 14, No. 3 (187), Prague 2017
 
Full Text: PDF file (2.3 MB)
 
Keywords: ITRF2014, GPS, noise analysis, velocity
 
Abstract: The velocities of the Global Positioning System (GPS) stations are widely employed for numerous geodynamical studies. The aim of this paper is to investigate the reliability of station velocities and to draw reader’s attention that for proper estimates of velocity, we need to consider the optimal character of noise. We focus on a set of 115 European GPS stations which contributed to the newest release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF), i.e. ITRF2014. Based on stacked Power Spectral Densities (PSDs), we show that amplitudes of seasonal signals are significant for nine harmonics of tropical year (365.25 days) and two harmonics of draconitic year (351.60 days). The amplitudes of tropical annual signal fall between 0.1-8.4 mm and are much higher for vertical component than for horizontal. Draconitic annual signal reaches the maximum amplitudes of 1.2 and 0.9 mm for North and East, respectively, whereas is slightly higher for the Up component with a maximum of 3.1 mm. We performed a noise analysis with Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) and found that stations in Central and Northern Europe are characterized by spectral index between flicker and random-walk noise, while stations in Southern and Western Europe: between white and flicker noise. Both amplitudes and spectral indices of power-law noise show a spatial correlation for Up component. We compared the uncertainties of velocities derived in this study with a combination of power-law and white noises to the ones officially released in the ITRF2014 with a pure white noise. A ratio of the two estimates is larger than 10 for 13% and 30% of stations in horizontal and vertical direction, respectively with medians of 6 and 7. The large differences support the fact that at the velocity determination the proper noise characteristic should be taken into account to avoid any mislead interpretation.